campaign_2016a_secondary_college

Home / campaign_2016a_secondary_college
campaign_2016a_secondary_college



Campaign 2016A: Retaining the Secondary College
open space and vegetation

 

  
Click on
the menu of Main
Pages here
, on
a photograph to enlarge it,
or on a blue hyperlink below.

 

 

 

THIS CAMPAIGN HAS FAILED TO SAVE MANY TREES, BUT IT STILL SEEKS INDIGENOUS PLANTING.
  • Planting
    Hotchpotch

    critique seeks 100%
    indigenous plants,
    not 28%.
  • Wholesale tree destruction occurred on the 8 hectare College site.
  • Professional arborist’s report on trees on the Secondary College site
  • The 2
    over-large ovals reduce
    buffer to Long
    Hollow
    and
    tree numbers
  • VSBA
    documents,
    and video
    of
    Heather Stewart on
    the site
  • VSBA

    ‘Information
    Session’
  • BCS
    Inc. Information
    Session
    , high
    resolution zoomable
    site view
  • Letter
    to the
    Education Minister
  • Crowdfunding
    for an arborist’s
    report
  • Earlymorning turnout
    by 250 citizens
    after BCS Inc.
    letter to the
    Premier
  • BaysideCity Council resolution,
    radio and television
    clips
  • See
    video
    of Daniel Andrews,
    later Labor Premier,
    with James Merlino,
    later Education
    Minister, telling
    people in 2013
    gathered at the
    north-east corner of
    the school that the
    choice was between
    Labor’s plan for a
    new school, and its
    opponents’ likely
    sale of the site for
    other uses.
  • Separation
    of Long Hollow
    Reserve instigated
    by Geoffrey Connard
    MLC

 


BCS Inc’s critique
of VSBA’s Planting
List
hotchpotch
is a looming
issue for the
site, as 72%
of new
planting would
be exotic and
non-indigenous
plants, which
is totally
inconsistent
with the
important Vegetation Protection Overlays that cover
Beaumaris in
order to help
maintain its
distinctive indigenous plant character.
BCS Inc.
advocates that
new planting
on this site
should match
the land in
the bushland
corridor –
which it is
part of – by
being 100%
indigenous
planting. That
could be
sensibly and
economically
sourced from
Bayside City
Council’s Community Plant Nursery,
which is just
north on
Reserve Road.
Regardlessof any
exemptions
that the
Education
Minister might
have, the
College site
is
nevertheless shown
on the Bayside
Planning
Scheme, which
was published
in the VictoriaGovernment
Gazette afterits necessary
approval by a
former
Planning
Minister, as
having a VPO3

overlay.
As that State
Government
VPO3 overlay
purports to
protect
against wanton
removal of

indigenous
vegetation, it
misleads the
public into
believing the
overlay
protects flora
here.

*
Thedesultory and
indifferent
‘consultation’
that the

Victorian Government’s
School
Building
Authority was
conducting

with opponents
of the extent
of unnecessary
tree removal
came to an abrupt,
and unannounced
end

when
it brought in
chainsaws and
very large
excavators to
destroy
numerous fine
trees on the
College site,
as many
residents and
BCS Inc.
members – who
had only been
made aware of
the coup by an
anonymous text
message that
BCS Inc. had
received –
watched in
anger. The
video in a
Facebookposting

by
Victoria’s
Shadow
Planning
Minister, Hon.
David Davis
MLC, who was
present to
witness the
slaughter,
records graphically how two
of the large
trees were
toppled, early
on Monday, 19
December 2016.

Murray
Thompson, MLA
for
Sandringham,
and Sue
Pennicuik MLC,
were also
watching this.
See BCS Inc.
President’s article
in The
Age.


*
The
professional
arborist’s report on
trees on the Secondary
College site –
commissioned with the
support of
crowd funding and
other very generous
donations – now
appears here.
See BCS Inc.
President’s media
statement here.

BCS Inc. appealed to
the MelbourneCricket Club

,
which remained in the
shadows and whose
plans for a ‘world
class’ sporting
precinct are at the
heart of the proposed
environmental
devastation, to do the
right thing. That
would have involved
removing a few metres
at the extremities of
oversized sporting
facilities and making
other minor design
changes. See a video
of the architect for
the school speaking,
and also the Cricket
Club CEO.

That

would not only have
saved many trees,
but would have
provided a much
needed buffer to the
continuous bushland and wildlife
corridor,
interrupted by
only two
roads, that
consists of
the nearby Beaumaris
Reserve
,
the
Long Hollow
Heathland
Reserve
,
and
Balcombe

Park.



*

The
two over-large
ovals in the College plan are
a cause of the great loss of
trees and general
amenity of the
area. Questioning the Victorian

School Building Authority
on why the northern oval, for
the Melbourne Cricket Club,
was to be so big was answered
by its claim, “That is the
minimum size need for first
class cricket”.
However,
the International

Cricket Council regulations

state, “A circular cricket
field is considered as the
perfect field, but generally
a cricket pitch is slightly
oval. Its diameter varies
between 137 m and 150 m. The
ICC Test Match Standard
Playing Conditions
Law

19.1 defines the
playing area as a minimum of
137.16 m from boundary to
boundary square of the
pitch, with the shorter of
the two square boundaries a
minimum of 59.43 m. The
straight boundary at both
ends of the pitch is a
minimum of 64 m. Distances
are measured from the centre
of the pitch”

Based on that, the MCC
northern oval size sought
seems to far exceed the
minimum standards for even
Test Cricket!  Using the
above specifications, a
re-drawing in the diagram
below of the boundaries to
meet the standards reveals
extra space to save and plant
more trees, and even extra car
parking. Similar savings of
tree numbers on the site would
result from a correspondingly
smaller Community Oval south
of it also. Reducing the size
of that southern oval would
save much more of the bushland
to its south and west. The
on-site marking of the
northern boundary of the bushland
buffer width
to
be left between the Long
Hollow Reserve and the
southern edge of the southern
oval shows it to be very
narrow, compared with the VSBA
diagrams, and leaves little
distance between the Reserve’s
boardwalk and the southern
oval. To enlarge the diagram
below of the northern oval,
double click on it. See

the proposal for Melbourne
Cricket Club facilities for the
site.



icc

* The ‘Information

Session’ on the Secondary College
site held by the Victorian

School Building Authority, at the
Beaumaris Community Centre on Friday, 25
November 2016, from 5:30 to 7:30 pm
disappointed many that went. Many people
left early, commenting that it was
nothing but a sham. It was just a static
display of plans, many of which were on
VSBA’s

website. A significant plan on its
website did list 18

trees that might now be
reprieved. Seats for those present were
not put out, there was no public address
system, but 2 policemen were on duty
there for 2 hours.



The VSBA Senior Advisor Community
Engagement and other VSBA staff were
there, and would engage with individuals
that approached them, and answer some of
their questions, but they declined
requests to address those present as a
whole, so that all those present could
hear the questions and answers.

 

 

vsba

Murray

Thompson, MLA for Sandringham,
at left, and Greg Mier, BCS Inc.
President, on the stage putting points
to those present, but Victorian

School Building Authority staff
present made no public response.

 

Double click on photo to enlarge it.

 

One of the three
State MPs present, Murray Thompson, MLA
for Sandringham, took the initiative,
walked up onto the stage, and asked
those present to hear points he thought
needed to be made. The BCS Inc.
President, who had previously listed
some of the many community
concerns, corrected VSBA
statements that BCS Inc. was happy with
the situtation, but VSBA staff made no
public response. The Shadow Education
Minister, Hon.
Nick Wakeling MLA, mingled with
residents discussing their concerns with
them, as did Sue
Pennicuik, Greens MLC for Southern
Metropolitan. Somebody had removed, by
Saturday, the many people’s banners
on the school site fence that had still
been there on Friday!

  *
At
last, obtained on 2016-11-09, six
important documents

, sought
from the Victorian School Building
Authority. See a 7-minute
video

of Heather Stewart on the
school site putting the case for the
trees.


   


 

* 
See
overflow information session
– with standing room
only – at the
Beaumaris Community
Centre, on 2016-11-16.
A 96 MB aerial photo
gives a zoomable high

resolution view
of the school site
then.


 

* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * *

COPY OF A
SIGNIFICANT LETTER TO VICTORIA’S
EDUCATION MINISTER


 

 


The
following correspondence was sent to the
Education Minister, James Merlino, on 18
November 2016 from a person who speaks
with considerable experience in planning
and design matters, and we have been
provided with consent to share it with
you, our concerned members.

 

Dear Minister,
    

I am a resident of Beaumaris and I
support and applaud the government
in its proposed redevelopment of the
Beaumaris Secondary College.
However I am most concerned about
the secret deal that has been struck
with the MCC
to occupy a substantial area of the
crown land that is the Beaumaris
Secondary College site.  You
and two other Ministers are the only
government agencies exempt from the
operation of the Planning and
Environment Act.  All other
agencies including transport and
utilities authorities are required
to follow due process (full
environmental assessment and
consultation) in obtaining sign off
for major projects.  This has
obviously led to a serious
complacency in the dealing with
affected communities that will
inevitably have political
consequences.
 
In this case that complacency has
led to the VSBA
and government:

  • signing an agreement
    with the MCC to occupy a substantial
    area of crown land with unknown
    implications for the local community
  • committing the
    government to a major multi purpose
    recreational facility on land which
    was to be redeveloped for a
    secondary school complex
  • shoe-horning the
    proposed new school into the corner
    of the site to allow room for these
    major facilities
  • shoe-horning the
    overall development into the site at
    significant cost to the local
    environment in loss of vegetation
  • proposing a major
    change of land use from educational
    to include a major multi purpose
    sporting complex with apparent
    day/night activity
  • potentially
    exceeding your authority to operate
    under the order-in-council exemption
    from planning scheme compliance.

The

time frame handed to the VSBA for
completion of the school is
obviously extremely tight,
excessively so in my
experience.  How else would
there be contracts let, tenders
called, equipment on site, etc while
plans were still in a fluid state
and such basic investigations as
vegetation reports are still being
produced.
   
While the community
committee is dealing with your
authority in an honest endeavour to
obtain compromised vegetation
outcomes, their hands and those of
your officials are tied as long as
the elements of the plan are
fixed.  There must be serious
modification to the proposed
development plan (elements removed)
if there is to be a reasonable
conclusion.  Otherwise you will
be executing and enforcing this
development plan over the serious
and widespread concern of the
Beaumaris community.
    

 

* * * * * * * * * *
* * * * *

* A
crowd

funding

page started by former Bayside
councillor, Heather Stewart, has approached
BCS Inc’s goal of $2,500 to fund a full
written professional Arborist’s Report – which
is now accessible above
– on what has increased to 249 trees at risk,
and was instrumental in arguing – tree by tree
– for proper justification before any tree’s
fate is decided. BCS Inc. thanks the donors,
whose names appear at that crowd funding page.
  
* Citizens
wearing red
to show anger – were at the school site from 7
a.m, on Monday, 24 October 2016, to deplore the
Victorian Government’s early morning sneak
chainsawing, at that stage, of up to 229 trees.
Talks with a representative of the Victorian

School Building Authority sought more
details of this plan before any tree loss, which
was agreed as indicated at a
petition
update at Change.org.   BCS
Inc. will provide more details of this plan here
if it receives them.
  
* See Facebook page by
Hon.

David Davis MLC, Shadow Minister for
Planning, on importance of citizens
getting specific details, and time to
interact before trees go, and not just spin.
He agreed that a detailed notice board
should be required to appear on the 80,000
square metre site – before any axing – as
residents must properly do even if
applying to remove one tree from a typical
800 square metre house lot. It seems that
Government notice boards only appear for
projects they are proud of, and not for
those they are ashamed of.
  
*
BCS
Inc. letter to Hon. Daniel Andrews
,
Victorian Premier, from BCS Inc, seeking a halt to
the planned removal of 229 trees from the
Secondary College site on 24 October to give time
for Bayside City Council and Beaumaris residents
to learn how many of each species of tree are to
be removed, the reasons, and the indigenous tree
species to replace them, and for their
views to be heard
. An article
describes this well.

 

 

college

Some of the
250 people seeking answers and
credible reasons for losing – at
that stage – 229 trees.



* 

See
unanimous resolution
of Bayside City Council of 18
October 2016.

Hear ABC
Radio interview on this devastation,
with retiring Southern Ward
representative, Cr

Heather Stewart, and see Channel

7 News video. Double click on
the photo below to enlarge it.

 

* Article
in the Bayside Leader on community
anger about being refused details of the tree
loss planned

 

*
BCS Inc. leaflet
letterboxed to all of Beaumaris south of
Balcombe Road on 21 October 2016* From
Murray Thompson, MLA for Sandringham: Petitionformfor completion by concerned
citizens, letter
to the Premier and the Education Minister, and
his MediaRelease

 

*
BCS Inc. MediaStatementon 18 October 2016 on ‘Stop the Chainsaws!’

 

sec college
 
Google view in 2015 of the largest
single inland area of public land in
Beaumaris,
on the west side of Reserve Road, between
Gramatan Avenue and Balcombe Road

 

*A
major emailto BCS Inc. from the Victorian
School Building Authority, and its website
page each propose the same list of
replacement plants. Very many are not
indigenous to Beaumaris (see Schedule
3 to the Bayside Planning
Scheme’s Vegetation Protection
Overlay, which covers all Beaumaris
residential land).




Those non-indigenous plants will clash
with and water down the present strong
and highly-regarded indigenous character
and beauty of the continuous bushland
corridor, interrupted by only two roads,
that consists of the nearby Beaumaris
Reserve, the Long Hollow
Heathland Reserve
, the Secondary
College, Balcombe
Park

, and Royal Melbourne Golf
Club’s west
course

, as well as the many
surrounding treed gardens.

* The
Secondary College site of 8 hectares was
separated from a previously larger area
of public land – as shown in a 1992subdivision plan

– to provide for
the Long Hollow Heathland Reserve. The
Reserve’s boundary is around the land
marked as the 2.35 ha Reserve No. 1 with
an accompanying statement that title to
that Reserve land, which was formerly
vested – along with the school site to
its north – in the Education Department,
has been transferred to the Queen. That
1992 formal subdivision was instigated
by the late Geoffrey
Connard

raising the matter in
Parliament when he was one of the two
Liberal MLCs for this area.

As Crown land, it has been designated a
Heathland Reserve under the management
of Bayside City Council. On the Bayside
PlanningScheme Map

, it can be seen that
the school land is zoned Public Use Zone
2 (the same as the two government
primary schools in Beaumaris and the
neighbouring Education Department next
to the electricity substation), whereas
the Heathland Reserve is zoned Public
Conservation and Resource Zone, which is
a very protective zoning. That zoning
does not bind the Government, but it
sets a goal for it.

 

Double click
on photos below to enlarge them.
 

 

trees01
 
Photo 1: No tree guard, machinery
over roots
tres02
 
Photo 2: Incomplete tree guard on
far side
trees03
 
Photo 3: No tree guards, roots
unprotected
trees04
 
Photo 4: No tree guard, work too
near roots

 

All the mature trees
above on 04 November 2016 were
unprotected, with root areas vulnerable
to harm.


 

 

 

Return to
the CAMPAIGNS page.


Link to the Port Phillip
Conservation Council Inc. – BCS Inc. has been a Member
Organization of it since 1970

https://www.high-endrolex.com/29